school's reaction: in defense of pina coladas
The good thing is that some people have taken it upon themselves to lighten the potential impact of Mr. Army's ridiculously stupid email.

From: [3L Student]
Subject: In Defense of Professor [Contracts]
Date: March 31, 2004 11:22:40 AM CST
To: Announcements

In Defense of Professor [Contracts],

Even though there is no point of my email and no reason why it should
be sent to the entire school, in following the footsteps of my ever so
wise predecessor [Mr.] "100 miles away from grading on to anything"
[Army], I shall continue.

I just want to defend Professor [Contracts] when he said almost 2 years
ago in my 1L Contracts class that there is "no duty to mitigate your
damages" in a contract case. What he actually meant was to differentiate
between a "mandatory" mitigation of damages and a "suggested"
mitigation. I know that this has caused a lot of controversy throughout
the school, so I thought to take it upon myself to settle it once and
for all.

[3L] "100 miles away from graduating" [Student]

And another:

From: [2L Student]
Subject: In Defense of Pina Coladas!
Date: March 31, 2004 11:51:00 AM CST
To: Announcements

Sorry, I couldn't resist becoming part of the debate.

No, really...

Pina Coladas often get a bad rap. But, hey, we're all forgiving
individuals, right? So why don't we give them a second chance?

Here's your opportunity:
Happy Hour, Friday at 4:00, Commons.

See you there,
[2L] "100 miles away from sobriety" [Student]